Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
Thanks for making me feel better about mine!
And you – for me about mine. Some jobs just feel like a battle. Mind you surveying the ‘battlefield’ when the job’s completed, does give a heightened (i.e. unrealistic!) sense of achievement.
Yesterday was “rear-bumper-dismantling-day” in the burridge household (garden). Only tool needed/ of any use is an angle grinder. Three bumpers = three angle grinder discs.
At least you can see your floor.
I’m assuming yours is under a 2″ thick layer of ‘U-Pol’ dust?
Don’t get carried away and fill-in the washer jet holes 🙂
Nice repair. As a ‘plan b’ i think i might have a spare bonnet going free.
I’m hoping/ expecting to be driving the D this summer – but not in time for the D rally and possibly/ probably not the national Festival in July. if i was driving through August and September i’d be happy. I’m deferring a few tasks until winter and would rather get a couple of months testing in than wait another year.
Following a thread on Aussiefrogs where someone is restoring a very old decal, they added Bluetooth to their radio. i’m using a couple of the components they used.
the BT module is a ‘behind the scenes’ thing whereby it’s turned on and off from a trigger switch/ signal rather than a button on it. In my testing the BT unit has dropped out a couple of times – even when next to my phone. i’ll have to see how i get on with it. This seems to be the current model. Looks a bit different but has the same functionality.
The amp is a separate unit. It’s just a small cheap amp from eBay. I deemed it cheap enough to make a mistake with if things didn’t work out. I didn’t really look into it again other than choosing something that was small enough to sit behind the dashboard and that can be switched on with a trigger signal. The original plan had been to trigger the BT and then for that – when waking up – to trigger the amp. In the end i decided to use the amp for the radio as well, so it’s the radio that triggers both BT and the amp.
https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/389402071924
The amp also has a USB charger outlet. I tried to put an extension lead on that but i couldn’t get it to work. if I’m using Bluetooth through my phone, i will want a charger in the car.I will add something somewhere else.
I also added a ‘LOC’ to convert the radio speaker outputs to RCA inputs to g into the amp alongside the BT signal.
The relay is a module thing. It has a permanent/ hard-wired power supply and (surprise surprise) is switched by an additional trigger signal. in this case the trigger provides a ‘negative earth’ route.
I’m using a manual starter button from a 60s DS as the momentary switch as it’s in keeping with the rest of my dashboard.
I also bought a couple of RCA splitter/ combiner leads to take the BT stereo output down to mono for the amp, and something to take the dual output from the radio LOC to single RCA channel.
I should add that the fader (which is what this thread is meant to be about!) i already had. it’s the one that comes with the old radio and i probably put up details of it in an earlier post here.
Well I’ve only gone and bloody done it!
With advice and suggestions from Steve Kendall and Geoffrey over on Aussiefrogs I’ve successfully added Bluetooth alongside my vintage radio (that’s ‘alongside’ rather than replaced) and both are controlled through my fader/ mixer control. It’s all controlled by the radio on/ off knob and I’ve not had to gut the radio and the changes I’ve made are reversible. I’ve basically soldered two wires inside the radio. Everything else is external and ‘plug and play’.
The radio is mono and so had just one channel into the fader, which was then divided between a front and rear speaker (twin mono if you will). I added a Bluetooth receiver and a stereo amp. The radio output goes into the amp as one channel, and the Bluetooth signal goes in as the other. Both channels come out of the amp and go into a DPDT (double pole-double throw) relay module. The relay allows one or other channel to pass through – so either the signal from the radio, or the signal from the Bluetooth. The selected channel then goes to my fader control and out to my front and rear speakers.
The radio power comes from the accessory terminal so there is no need to turn on the ignition – which risks damaging the coil. The power for the Bluetooth amp and relay are also wired to the accessory terminal, but the ‘wake-up’ signals they depend on come from switching the radio on. When the radio is off, there is no power drain.

At the moment I’m using a momentary switch on the side of my dash to trigger the relay to switch, but i have plans to install a ‘secret’ button on the radio for selecting/ deselecting bluetooth.

Is the Warminster car the dSuper5 from Car & Classics?
If so, i notice on the photos of that car that the boot badge says ‘DSuper’ on one plate and ‘5’ on a separate plate. That’s the same as the blue car photo i posted above – albeit a different blue car. My assumption in that case, and it was no more than an assumption, was that the car was a 1985cc D Super but with the optional 5th gear. I could be wrong. Perhaps those are early boot badges and both that car and your Warminster car are 2175cc ‘DSuper5s’?
And like the South African car, the Warminster ad says it’s 2100cc. Well that’s neither 1985cc or 2175cc. It looks like that is just be a lazy assumption on the site’s part because they’ve been told it’s a ’21’. On the DVLA site the car is listed as 2175cc. Mind you, it also says it was first registered in August 1972. the 2175cc ‘DSuper5’ went on sale in Autumn 72 for the 1973 model year, so a registration date of august 1972 is a bit early? i suspect though that this may be a quirk from when the car was imported to the UK and that the August date is a bit wobbly.
All of this is a long winded way to say that when you go to see the Warminster car, make a point of looking at the engine tag down by the starter motor. If it’s a proper 2175cc DSuper5, the engine tag will say ‘DX2’ on it. If it says ‘DY’ or ‘DV’ on it then at its heart it’s a 1985cc engine/ car but could have been upgraded to be 2175cc. That’s not necessarily a reason not to buy it, but go in to any purchase ‘eyes open’.
EDIT. I wrote that the ID19 and ID20 both had the same engine. They were both 1985cc, but the ID19 engine was badged as ‘DV2’ and the ID20 engine was badged as ‘DY2’.
Although the 1985cc DSuper was briefly available with a fifth gear option, that seems to have been revoked – with a ‘DSuper’ reverting to 4 gears – when the ‘proper’ DSuper5 was added to the ID range. if you wanted a fifth gear, you had to buy the 2175cc car.
Into the 70s, and even though the names changed, i think you still find ‘ID19’ and ‘ID20’ on the chassis tags up by the wiper motor.
This table is useful. Confusingly, while an ID19 had a DV engine and the factory car code was also DV, ID20s had the ‘DY’ engine but the factory car code was ‘DT’! That’s because the car code ‘DY’ was already used for the 1985cc Ds19s. SO….an ID 20 (later the DSuper like the St.Albans car) is basically a DS19 but with manual gear change. it’s beginning to sound quite attractive! Right at the bottom are the ‘DP’ cars – these are the 2175cc ‘DSuper5’ cars that used to be Ds21s.

Where as previously there was only an ID19, in 1969 Citroen added an ID20 alongside the ID19. Both were manual four speeds with the same 1985cc engines, except that the ID20 had slightly better trim and was tuned to give a few more BHP.
For the 1970 year, the cars were renamed. the ID19 became the DSpecial and the ID20 became a DSuper.
After a year or so, Citroen offered an extra fifth gear for the D Super – so there were SOME 1985cc cars that were DSuper (5)s. The DS21 (2175cc) could be bought with a manual 5 speed box.
Then in 72 or maybe 73, the DS21 was dropped from the Ds range and instead resurrected as part of the ID range – where it became the 2175cc ‘DSuper 5’. Sounds like the St.Albans car is a standard 1985cc 4 speed DSuper. Chassis tags still said ‘ID20’. All perfectly legit. It may not be a ‘DSuper5’. but it’s still a step above a DSpecial and from what Julian has said, might be worth haggling over.



My cars a bvh, but if it was manual i wouldn’t carry a spare clutch cable up in the roof channel.
Fitting a clutch cable is maybe a couple of hours work. Refitting the b*stard Pallas roof trim is about four!
If it helps….
These are four photos by Stuart McGregor that go with the text in the post above – which I repeat here. You can also find a good exploded diagram of the parts in drawing number 2-142/1 in the early pages of manual 648.

As Stuart wrote:
From the bottom you’ll have to undo the pinch bolt on the lever (this is a reference to the bolt through part 7 in the drawing) and pry the lever off the pedal shaft (part 1 in the drawing)…….

…..to get to the split pin/clevis pin (Stuarts photo above shows some kind of knotted or tangled wire?) that secures the cable inner at the bottom end.
Then from the top you need to remove the pozidrive screw that holds the clamp plate (part 5?) holding the outer in place. (near to the engine mount bolt).

With that done remove the clamp plate and the outer will lift out.

A telescopic magnetic picker may be your friend here! There’s a pic that shows that upper part disassembled if that helps.Getting that small clamp plate (part 5) in position and fixed on reassembly will most likely be your biggest challenge. You may be best to remove a few items that obscure it. Perhaps the weight fixed to the bulkhead and the engine mount? (In a later post Stuart said it may not be as bad as he thought and that a LONG screwdriver could be used to access the screw).
Have included a pic that includes these two items (the phots above), though appreciate that there’s a lot of EFI hardware etc also sitting above this area.
I recall a VERY long thread about this (throttle cable replacement on a LHD efi car) on another forum: the largely (though not exclusively) American ‘CitroenDSID’ group on a platform called ‘IO’. You could do a lot worse than seeking out that thread (and joining the forum if you really, really need to).
This is the thread though i’m not sure you will be able to access it. The thread was called “Oh, Snap!!!”
https://groups.io/g/CitroenDSID/topic/94635675#msg96040
It was 82 posts long (!) and in early posts advice included:
From Michael Faulks
“access is tight but it can be replaced without taking the engine out. There is a clamp just above the pulley that holds the sheath and a slot in the bracket so the cable can be threaded onto the pulley. Undo the clamp and the adjuster bracket then the cable just pulls out of the engine bay.And from Stuart McGregor:
“Here’s a few more pix that show the stages below.From the bottom you’ll have to undo the pinch bolt on the lever and pry the lever off the pedal shaft to get to the split pin/clevis pin that secures the cable inner at the bottom end.
Then from the top you need to remove the pozi screw that holds the clamp plate holding the outer in place. With that done remove the clamp plate and the outer will lift out. A telescopic magnetic picker may be your friend here! There’s a pic that shows that upper part disassembled if that helps.
Getting that small clamp plate in position and fixed on reassembly will most likely be your biggest challenge. You may be best to remove a few items that obscure it. Perhaps the weight fixed to the bulkhead and the engine mount? Have included a pic that includes these two items, though appreciate that there’s a lot of EFI hardware etc also sitting above this area. It’s difficult to figure that out as I don’t have an engine in my car!”
As a South African car, they followed their own trim specification and names. The advert says it 2100cc but a DS20/5 was a 1985cc DY3 engine with a five speed box.
https://www.citroenet.org.uk/publicity-brochures/ds/za/za-ds.html
So a bit/ lot like the ‘DSuper(5)’ (a 1985cc DSuper but with an extra gear) but NOT like the ‘DSuper5’ (2175cc engine and an extra gear).
The photos show a head rebuild, maybe the pots were upgraded from 1985cc but that would make it 2175cc not 2100cc?
From the description, ownership and willingness to show photos, this might not be a bad car – but the price certainly reflects that. And be aware that it’s not just European cars: South African cars can have rust too 🙂
Get yourself a good dSuper 5 and i think you’ll find it a keeper. Prior to 1973, it was a badged as a Ds21 5 speed manual but they are virtually the same thing.
Not cars i’d suggest you entertain, but I had THREE barn finds at the weekend! Last June I’d run past someone’s house in a local village early one morning and spotted a white DS on a drive. i went back and took a photo and put a note through the door but heard nothing.

On sunday (12 months later!) the owner texted me out of the blue asking for advice and a possible value.
The white car under a car cover turned out to be a LHD 1969 ID20. It had obvious rot around the front top of the screen which you have to assume will be found to be much worse when you inevitably take the roof off. (You can see it in the photo above). Sure enough there had been water in the footwells and the drivers footwell floor was rotted (you could see the ground through it) though the inner sills seemed okay. there were some signs of minor rust in the boot but the floor looked solid. i couldn’t get behind the panel that covers the torsion bar. the gutters along the sides of the boot seemed very tidy whereas i’d expected rust. I couldn’t see the underside of the car or exhaust. Money had been spent on the car a few years ago over at the Chevronics Centre including a new alternator and other engine work. They had also said it might need a head gasket replacement. Under the bonnet it looked ‘tired’ and dirty but nothing that would not clean up and i’ve seen a LOT worse. On the plus side, as a 69 car, it has the quirky old ‘slab’ dash. The ID20 is the more powerful variant of the ID19 and in 1970 was re-badged the ‘DSuper’. As such, it’s like the St.Albans car but a couple of years older. For someone who knows what to expect, this could be a nice car after some work. I would estimate this is worth £4K to £5K to the right, brave person who knows what they’re doing and that feels consistent with £10K for the more solid St. Albans car.
Anyway, he then told me he had two more Ds in barns! Both LHD and both covered in a patina of heavy dust. He’d had all three cars over 20 years and these other two had not been driven/ run in quite a while. First up was a 1975 DS23 eft bvh pallas with leather interior – so top spec.
Metallic grey with black leather. It had had a cheap(ish) respray and was showing surface rust though nothing serious. No major dinks that i could see. Couldn’t see underneath. No weeds, no mould, no mildew. It was ‘complete’ – all together, and looked very respectable under the bonnet just dust and grease.
With a bit of tinkering it looked like it could be persuaded to start. Possible water pump or expansion tank leak. Efi’s can be tricky beasts and as it’s not currently a runner, i felt that would affect the value/ interest.
Next up was a 1967 frogeye ID19!

This was lovely – very original – dark blue with a white roof and a very tidy red rhovyline interior.

Like the white car it has the ‘slab’ dashboard – albeit with different style buttons and stalks and the addition of a hazard light with on the dash. The hazard light looked to be genuine Citroen type. paintwork/ bodywork very tidy. Coffin shaped tail lights (not cracked) and plastic rear indicator trumpets (not cracked).Boot clean and tidy.

No signs of rust that i remember. Couldn’t get the bonnet up so not sure if it had power steering or not. Couldn’t see underneath. No weeds, no mould, no mildew. Overall it looked very respectable and very ‘genuine’. Again, not been run in a while but should be easy to get it going as a ‘proof of concept’. i would like to think that – after a good clean and hoover – this car could virtually be used as it was. But that is what i thought about my car 12 years ago!
I’m trying to hook him up with potential sale sites/ buyers.
-
AuthorPosts








